Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPákozdy, Ákos
dc.contributor.authorMikscha, Ramóna
dc.contributor.authorJerzsele, Ákos
dc.date.accessioned2021-01-22T09:43:19Z
dc.date.available2021-01-22T09:43:19Z
dc.date.issued2017-03
dc.identifier.citationMagyar Állatorvosok Lapja 139(3),143-156. (2017)en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10832/2600
dc.description.abstractSummary Background: Epilepsy is one of the most common diseases in feline neurology. Phenobarbital is the most frequently used anticonvulsant for feline epilepsy, but many other drugs have been already tested. Objectives: The objective of the present work is to analyse peroral antiepileptic treatment options for cats, compare different drugs, regarding their efficacy, side effects and application frequency. Materials and Methods: The encountered literature is critically concerning its strength for evidence (type and evidence of literature, and in case of studies, type, number of patients, observational period). Additionally, reference lists were used to find related records, respectively primary literature about feline epilepsy and diverse anticonvulsants. Results and Discussion: Fifteen drugs are currently described in the literature against feline epilepsy. Regarding their pharamacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, side effects and clinical experience, the authors recommend phenobarbital, zonisamide, levetiracetam for clinical use in epileptic cats. The use of bromide, diazepam, carbamazepine, propentofylline, taurin, gabapentin, pregabalin and topiramat is conditionally recommended. Primidone, phenytoin and valproic acid are not recommended. The information about anti-epileptic therapy in cats is based on expert opinions, case reports (Class IV) and a small number of prospective and retrospective studies (class III). Not a single Class I or II study (placebo controlled, randomized, double blind trial), describing the clinical efficacy is available. Furthermore, the small number of cats, insufficient observation time, simultaneous administration of different anticonvulsive drugs and missing comparative studies cause an additional decrease of evidence. In conclusion, the treatment of epilepsy in cats is based only on weak evidence.en_US
dc.language.isohuen_US
dc.publisherMagyar Állatorvosok Lapjaen_US
dc.titleSzájon át adható antiepileptikumok macskák részére Irodalmi összefoglalóen_US
dc.title.alternativeOral antiepileptic drugs for cats Literature reviewen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationMagyar Állatorvosok Lapja 139(3),143-156.(2017)


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record