Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKuder, Maximilian
dc.date.accessioned2025-04-29T07:22:30Z
dc.date.available2025-04-29T07:22:30Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10832/4350
dc.description.abstractThe comparative analysis of suture anchors, materials, and bone response highlights several key considerations for both human and veterinary orthopedic applications. Studies demonstrate that anchor design, orientation, and material composition significantly influence clinical outcomes, particularly in terms of bone preservation, integration, and mechanical performance. All-suture anchors appear advantageous for long-term bone integrity, exhibiting lower osteolytic changes and better preservation of bone structure than biocomposite and metal-based anchors (1). Notably, newer anchors such as the JuggerKnot Long Soft Anchor show effective load resistance while requiring minimal bone contact, making them suitable for procedures where bone preservation is a priority (18).en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.titleTendon anchoring methods in small animals – literature reviewen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record